A Review of Sat Essay Samples 2016

A Review of Sat Essay Samples 2016 All About Sat Essay Samples 2016 Your work is to produce the grader seem as if you agree. It is extremely important to understand if you're thinking of applying to college. Don't rush and be sure that everything you learn makes sense. There ought to be an appropriate sequence for the SAT essay, bear in mind that the essay should be broken into several paragraphs where each ought to be structured with respect to the importance. The essays are where it is possible to display your personality. The new essay is far more straightforward. The SSAT essay is the initial portion of the SSAT exam. Essay writing is a critical section for an SAT course, as it's the very first and foremost portion of it. Prayer doesn't have to be long and complicated. Below, you will find SAT essay advice that can help to enhance your scores. My whole school had a spirit week specializing in mental wellness awareness. In addition, don't be so determined to make it to the goal that you repeatedly have them get away with it. On account of the recent increase in incidents of school violence, a variety of schools across the nation are limiting the variety of times every student can go to her or his locker. The subsequent few months were then a practice of steady improvement like I wrote more sample tests. The very last thing you would like is to need to retake the full exam, or, worse yet, not have the ability to apply to a specific college, simply because you took the exam without the essay. There are a lot of students in your school who intend to graduate and head directly to a number of the biggest colleges in the nation. It is essential to remain true to yourself and to concentrate on what you would like to do, not what a college would like you to do. It's at times difficult to come across a qualified, highly experienced SAT tutor or ACT tutor in a particular area, but expert SAT and ACT online tutors can offer the exact same results as if he or she was right there in your house, and you're able to work with the ideal online tutors to help your son or daughter get the very best score they can! At precisely the same time, however, it embodies some of the most problematic details of the new SAT for me. Attempt to finish your SAT registration when possible, because the late registration usually needs an excess fee. The important difference between both tests deals with essay content. The question isn't really seeking your opinion. If quality work is all you want, you should think about giving us an opportunity to follow you and supply you with college essay help that will provide you with value for each penny you pay. You'll ideally need to compose two or three practice essays before you sit for the actual thing. Again, a superb test-prep book will inform you all of the appropriate grammar rules that appear in the test and you just have to memorize them. Don't worry if a number of the articles you happen across seem long. If you'd like to concentrate on one specific region of the test, I would suggest purchasing a book (yes, a true book!) Great news is here to remain. Ideally, the aim of close reading is to realize how an author's argument works as precisely as possible as a way to formulate a cogent and well-reasoned reaction. Opt for a prompt at random from above, or select a topic which you think will be hard that you detach from (because you're going to want to write about this issue, as opposed to the argument) set timer to 50 minutes and compose the essay. You shouldn't structure or consider your argument because it is going to also slow you down. Each argument needs to be stated in a different paragraph starting from the strongest one. A Startling Fact about Sat Essay Samples 2016 Uncovered Keep your entire body and mind healthy. Tevvan acknowledges that a lot of the chunks of time we've got in a day are too short to bother attempting to use productively. In a couple of minutes, you may truly be feeling friendlier. On the 1 hand, percentile scores on this kind of imperfect measure can be quite misleading. What the In-Crowd Won't Tell You About Sat Essay Samples 2016 In order to decide on whether you're a superior fit for our program, we ask you to deliver some additional info. Also, you need to use a formal type of address. You would like your application to get somewhat of a theme because otherwise, you're just another number. An application doesn't tell you a lot about someone besides their interests and what they're good at. For an excellent gauge of what is very likely to happen, think about the French AP exam, which was revised a few years ago to be more holistic and relevant. Both tests include optional essays whose scores aren't includ ed in the last composite scores. You will be able to see scores online about 10-20 days following the test. There's no composite SAT Essay score (the 3 scores aren't added together) and there aren't any percentiles.

Sample GED Compare and Contrast Essay Topics

Sample GED Compare and Contrast Essay TopicsWhile you are taking your GED, you will learn to compare one subject of the GED Compare and contrast essay topics to another. There are a number of ways to do this, and there are some methods that are more effective than others. You will probably find that you spend more time practicing the easier methods. But they will also have the advantage of being less time consuming and more effective.Sample GED Compare and contrast essay topics are really simple to understand. You will begin by looking at each topic on its own. Then you will move to the comparison, which will be a case study. Then you will draw a summary from both topics. It is really that simple.The main similarity between them is that they take a standard portion of time and a standard length of time to complete. But they differ in that one requires you to perform research for the other.In the first method, you will need to write several papers. The second method, on the other hand , will be much faster because you only need to write one or two papers. Both methods will require you to practice writing. But you will be able to do so much more quickly in the second method.Finally, you will not be getting paid to get these articles written for you. They are just going to be your work.If you get to the point where you have three or four drafts of these, I would suggest that you draft one at a time. Only then can you be sure that you are getting it right. Only then can you be sure that you can get it out there on your essay.But if you get to the point where you have a dozen drafts, I would suggest that you draft several of them. Only then can you be sure that you are getting it right. Only then can you be sure that you can get it out there on your essay. If you have several drafts, you can send them out as a set.

AP Essay Topics Over 13 Colonies

AP Essay Topics Over 13 ColoniesAt the college level AP courses are still designed to be used for exams so they offer essay topics over 13 colonies. The AP exam is meant to test your understanding of a subject from the perspective of learning. It is not just a test of your grammar and spelling skills but an opportunity to practice your reading, writing, and speaking skills. It is still one of the hardest tests that you will ever have to take and you should practice the topics you study in order to prepare for it.There are several essay topics available that you can choose from. You can choose topics from the history of the United States, North American History, International Relations, World History, U.S. History, or any other topic you want. You should think about the problems that you would be facing if you took this exam, such as living in poverty, being a poor student, or having to go to school while being a victim of violence.Reading and research is always important when taking an exam like this so you should definitely plan out what reading material you are going to use before you begin. You can get online guides for essays that you can use in your studies as well. These guides can help you get ideas for writing and reading about different topics and can help you plan out the entire essay.This can be a good chance to learn more about history or a specific topic and see what the background is behind it. A lot of people tend to write about topics that they know about and know very little about. In other words, they are never really doing any research at all. If you choose a topic that is unfamiliar to you, then you might never understand it fully, which is never a good thing to do.Some topics that are popular are the history of the United States, history of North America, world history, and world politics. Each topic is designed to have two parts, a title and a chapter where you will start your essay and write about your experience with that particular topi c.Writing your essay could be tricky if you don't know what you are doing and you will need a good guide to help you study and prepare. There are many ways to make this happen but this is one of the best ways and a great way to save money. You can look for help online for essay topics over 13 colonies. They have an online guide that you can download and use on your computer to help you with essay topics over 13 colonies.This guide is geared toward helping you with essay topics over 13 colonies and gives you different strategies to help you organize and learn the topics. You can also use it to review when you are preparing for the AP exam. It is a great way to prepare and is much better than getting help from a book or looking for free help online.

Elie Wiesels Essay on Student Essay Contests

Elie Wiesel's Essay on Student Essay ContestsIn his essay, 'The Meaning of Life,' Nobel Prize winner Elie Wiesel declared that in order to find out what it means to live well, you must participate in a sample student essay contest. If you are seeking meaningful ways to determine whether or not a particular program is right for you, this article will provide you with useful pointers.Elie Wiesel believed that life's challenges teach you something important about yourself. He stated, 'What we do or what we suffer from teaches us about ourselves.' To learn more about what it means to live a good life, Elie Wiesel urged you to take part in a student essay contest. Writing a college essay is hard enough, but writing a student essay contest entry is even more difficult.However, the fact that the writer has to prove to his college or university that he has what it takes to succeed as a writer will motivate him to do his best. While writing the essay, your attention will be focused on what yo u are writing, so what you want to show is the beauty of life and all the goodness that one can achieve. Besides, the student essay contest allows you to submit your essay online and you will be able to do it in the comfort of your own home.Since college students are usually busy, they cannot spend much time reading the essays being written by others. Most students tend to take the college essay contests too seriously, which results in poor work habits that may hinder their career success.With Elie Wiesel's advice, remember that you must participate in a sample student essay contest because it will motivate you to write a better essay. You will have the motivation of having something to show for your hard work.On the other hand, students struggle a lot to find the motivation that a contest provides. Now, students have their own writing contest websites to encourage them. With their help, you can transform your day into a new beginning.The best thing about writing a student essay con test is that it can help you improve your writing skills. If you want to study hard and become an expert essay writer, you should try to learn from the mistakes of others and write better essay entries.

The role of US Government on Abortions

Abortion has been a contentious issue in the American society. The society has been controlling fertility using abortion irrespective of its legality. The United States legalised this practice before 1880; afterwards, it was banned in most states but only allowed when a woman’s life was to be saved or in case a woman’s life was in danger.Advertising We will write a custom research paper sample on The role of US Government on Abortions specifically for you for only $16.05 $11/page Learn More Traditionally, women practiced abortion amid public support and no court conviction (Libertarianism). Notably, during this time even the Church did not lead a repression against this act. Before the 19th century, women could assist each other in the abortion process. Women healers in US openly trained other women to abort without judicial interventions. The US government has overtime remained in focus on abortion issues. Historical court rulings reveal t he divisions that have existed in the US on the topic of abortion. The government has been changing positions on this issue with numerous amendments. This has been due to the differences in opinion between the Democrats and Republicans on abortion. In the early 1800, there was no law touching on abortion for women, it was not easy for them to refuse to go along with abortion practices hence eliminating the need for it (Abortion | American Civil Liberties Union). The US government has ensured that women experiencing inferior abortions and affected by abdominal infections are treated in the emergency wards that were established in some of their hospitals. Markedly, the doctors were the ones allowed to perform this process. If abortion was to be done to a young female, the doctors were to inform their parents before carrying out this operation. This information was to remove any liability from the doctor in case of any risk that can arise like death of the young female. In 1973, in a c ase between Roe versus Wade, the Supreme Court ruled that a woman should be the one to decide when to have an abortion. This Amendment Concept of Human Liberty was considered as a right of privacy. In Roe versus Wade, the term ‘right of privacy’ was viewed as broad to include whether a woman opts to abort or not. Notably, this ruling legalised abortion in the US. During this time, the government initiative that supports health care, Medicaid, offered funding to women who wanted to stop pregnancy. The land-mark ruling by the Supreme Court made women have the legal right to abortion.Advertising Looking for research paper on government? Let's see if we can help you! Get your first paper with 15% OFF Learn More This ruling ensured that the women’s rights were entrenched in the constitution. Therefore, barriers of whichever nature to abortion were deemed to be unconstitutional at this point. It is clear that the government was not able to determine out r ightly when life begins. The Texas and Georgia court rulings left a key question on whether a foetus has right to life or not. Obviously, the rulings had little concern for the life of the unborn babies; therefore, presuming that life begins at the start of the third trimester and not necessarily at conception. The third trimester is a period between the 7th and the 9th month of pregnancy. Therefore, the government removed all restrictions that were on abortion between conception and the sixth month. In Doe versus Bolton’s case in Georgia, Justice Harry Blackmun ruled that the life of a mother encompasses her emotional, physical, psychological and family well-being. This ruling also gave room for abortion even at the 3rd trimester since a woman’s health was given more priority than the life of the foetus. Conversely, in 1977 the federal government offered to limit Medicaid funding to support abortion. By 1981, the government no longer allowed all the above exceptions. Overtime, abortion raised different opinions. This continuity led to reacceptance of the three exceptions. Currently, the Hyde amendment has all the three exceptions as the only reasons that can make one carry out abortion. Markedly, the ban on Medicaid for funding abortion significantly affects low income females. Civil discussion came to an agreement that a pregnant woman and her doctor have a legal right to whether to abort or not and only if her health is in danger that she is forced to terminate the pregnancy. The US government started to fund trimester abortions to help poor pregnant women whose health were in danger. The government also required parents to be involved in case their children are involved in abortion practices. They were to be informed by the doctors verbally or in writing, failure of which penalties are to follow. In Thornburg versus American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists of 1986, the Supreme Court changed that the 3rd trimester abortions should t ake into concern the life of the child in preference to the mother’s life.Advertising We will write a custom research paper sample on The role of US Government on Abortions specifically for you for only $16.05 $11/page Learn More In addition, women were to be trained on prenatal development, educated on abortion alternatives and informed on risks that accompany abortion. Citizens began to avoid abortion practices although the abortion law remained in force. Most states began restricting abortion by instituting legislative measures following the 1986 court ruling. The year 1989 marked a drastic shift from the earlier rulings on when life begins. In Webster versus Reproductive Health Services, the court declared that life begins at conception and that the federal government has no interest on the development of the foetus during pregnancy. In Planned Parenthood versus Casey case of 1992, the court ruled that when performing an abortion, 24 hours wa iting period should be given to the victim. This was meant to prepare the woman psychologically hence have a full consent of abortion. The Hyde amendment having restricted funding abortion placed low income women at risk since they could take a lot of time struggling to meet the cost of abortion. These women even lacked insurance covers on abortion. These women could even opt to receive support from untrained practitioners, which is always unsafe and illegal. This amendment denies women abortion services even in case of serious mental or health problems. The differences in earning levels of American women show marginalization that the amendment has entrenched. It denied poor women basic reproductive health care. Others are of the view that the amendment has infringed on the right of the womenfolk. However, they could get funds during the late stages of pregnancy which is always accompanied by high health risks. In 2000, the US government rejected partial birth control because it did not protect the life of a pregnant woman. The life of a pregnant woman was to be considered and be protected (History of Abortion). The government highly supported the use of contraceptives. The US government encouraged women to use them to prevent the unplanned pregnancies. In case of full term pregnancy or rape, federal medical funds were expelled to pay for abortion, but only if the woman’s health was at risk. This initiative saw 17 states in the US pay for abortions of underprivileged women as others were paid by public funds. The Partial-Birth Abortion Act of 2003 passed legislation that a doctor found performing a partial birth control was to be imprisoned for two years while a woman undergoing the procedure was not be prosecuted with an indemnity to save her life. In addition, charges against the mother or the doctor should be introverted as it was considered as a way of prohibiting abortion.Advertising Looking for research paper on government? Let's see if we can help you! Get your first paper with 15% OFF Learn More Life was considered to begin at conception. The senate in 2011 removed abortion coverage for women who were raped in the military as they argued that the military are pro-life (History of Abortion). However, abortion coverage still remained in force for civilians who were employed by the federal and state governments. Nevertheless, Pentagon funds were used to cover the abortion procedure in cases where a mother’s life was in danger. Federal tax dollars were kept in separate domestic accounts as per the US government; this was to take care of abortion cases. Those with unlimited options had to pay at least $1per month to help in supporting them in case of abortion (Torre). According to this law, any person interested in signing for the public option, a federally administered programme, paid for abortion treatment. According to Vice President Joe Biden, life begins at conception; therefore, abortion process stops the life of an innocent soul. This is also in line with the churc h teachings. He ensured that the government took an initiative to illegalise abortion unless under certain circumstances. The government ensured public justice by protecting the primary life-giving of its people and offering supportive conditions in nurturing children, in the society. In case of unplanned pregnancies, the government had to take corrective measures to prevent reoccurrence of the problem rather than promoting abortion on the basis of individual sovereignty. Additionally, the government ensured that families took the responsibility of bringing up their children. The US government instituted counselling services on health of both the child and the mother, pregnancy and adoption services hence minimising abortion practices. Massive counselling on the impacts of abortion reduced abortion rate tremendously. This idea has been acknowledged by religions especially the Catholic Church which believes that life begins at conception. They were at the frontline in offering pregna ncy counselling on impacts of abortion to women (History of Abortion). The Church believed that abortion was an act against the will of God. According to the Church, life begins at conception; therefore, any attempt to carry out abortion at any point of pregnancy contravenes the will of God. In addition, the Church held that the act was also contravening human beings right to life. A few citizens in the US came out to oppose the government funding on abortion. However, when asked to give reasons for their opposition, only 3% supported funding of abortion while 8% said that there was a possibility that the government is spending a lot of money towards abortion. However, the US government held that they were only supporting reforms on abortion. The government has gone ahead to establish emergency wards in some hospitals just to ensure that the life of a mother undergoing abortion illegally is saved. The Pew Research of 2009 showed that 42% support the idea but around 38% proposals opp ose it (Abortion Plays Small Role in Health Reform Opposition). An inclusion of this policy supporting funding of abortion will encourage women to engage in abortion practices. Nonetheless, only 28% of the proposals wanted it be included thus causing division during the health care debate. As 42% of the citizens wanted abortion to be covered with government benefit, 49% were of the contrary idea. The US government has tried to illegalise abortion since the majority of its citizens has agreed that it should be allowed when the life of the pregnant mother is in danger (Abortion Plays Small Role in Health Reform Opposition). Opposition of healthcare reforms was turned down even before the house passed its report. Although these debates took place, some US citizens still remained undecided about the proposals. Nevertheless, the government continued to support the abortion reforms just to ensure its citizens are able to support and contribute towards the reforms. This legislation saw a 5 % decline in abortion practices, the biggest one-year decrease in ten years. Experts held that the decrease in the rate of abortion was as a result of the harsh economic condition that was experienced worldwide. The situation made women to be so careful with their sexual lives. In 2009, the Centre for Birth Control collected data which indicated that both rate and number of abortion fell to 5% (Sherratt). For example, California reported high decrease of abortion rates as a result of the implementation of these policies. Researchers found that out of 1000 females who are capable of giving birth, about 16 underwent abortion in 2008 while 15 did abortion in 2009; this interpreted to almost 38,000 less abortion in one year. The use of contraceptives; the pills, patch, intrauterine device (IUD), T-shaped plastic sperm-killer, provided by the government for both women and teenagers contributed the decline of abortion. Another cause for the abortion decline was due to morning after pills. It was accessible to many women and teenagers because it was to be sold to women above 18 years in 2006; however, in 2007 the age was lowered to 17. Morning after pills is a form of emergency contraception. Elizabeth Ananat, a Duke University assistant professor, held that abortion should be restricted by controlling pregnancy through the provision of birth control techniques (Sherratt). In 2009, President Obama lifted restrictions that were on the funding of abortion. During this time, the senate was under the control of the pro-abortion while the House of Representatives was under the control of the anti-abortion law makers (Robinson). His predecessor affirmed the restrictions on the Medicaid funding on abortion. During Bush’s reign, there were no funds for family planning services that were given to bodies that conducted abortion. So serious was this restriction that even non-US government funds could not find their way into supporting family planning services. This rule has been reinstated and rescinded among the Republicans and Democrats Head of States. For instance, Bill Clinton ensured that taxpayers’ funds were used to support abortion but when Bush took Office, he removed the funding. Currently, the Obama administration has rescinded the law. Bush, during his times, upheld that no single taxpayers’ money should be used to support abortions. This reinstatement of the law went down well with the anti-abortions. These groups of people felt that it was a clear betrayal to American taxpayers who at the time were under a financial crisis. This law was known as the Mexico City Policy. They cited an example of over $400 million that US spent overseas on family planning activities. On the other hand, the anti-laws argue that the law minimize dangerous abortions and deaths that are conducted in the back streets of poor nations. A denial on contraception, they believe has created low funding to overseas organizations tasked with offering fa mily-planning and healthcare services. This law has led to different opinions among US citizens as they are divided between the Democrats and the Republicans position. It has been used as a tit for tat game when the main US political parties shift at the White House. The lifting of the restriction has seen a steady increase in the number of terminated lives. For instance, in 2011, close to 329,445 abortions were carried out; this is far much higher than those abortions carried out in 2010. Statistically, over 18 million abortions had been carried out since the Supreme Court’s ruling on Roe versus Wade’s case in 1973. The department of Planned Parenthood received $542.4 million to use in supporting abortion. Again, black women are 5 times more to perform an abortion than white women. As a result, over 1, 876 lives of black children are terminated through abortion every day in the US. Abortion has tremendously reduced the number of black Americans. This topic has been so controversial with others argue that the government should not force its citizens to pay taxes which are going to be used in stopping innocent lives. Those for the law argue that the US citizens are paying for acts they do not do; therefore, the extra abortion costs should be met by the victims. They go ahead to reveal that even if a woman becomes pregnant due to rape, the child is innocent and should not be aborted at any cost. The government should not demand to acquire tax from its citizens. The right of a woman to abort should not entitle her to the federal funds. Most citizens believe that it is their constitutional right to carry out abortion. This idea has received backings from the Democrats and the Supreme Court. They feel it is necessary to offer funding for family planning and abortion in case a woman’s life is in danger. On the other hand, the Republican Party has held that life termination through abortion is illegal; as a result, the government should not pay f or such illegal activities. From this point, it is clear that the US government has been changing their position on abortion depending on the political party that takes control of the White House. The two main political parties hold different ideologies on this contentious topic. Presently, some legislators are lobbying to pass laws that will totally deny all women from buying insurance policies that cover abortion. Abortion affects directly the lives of both the mother and the foetus. With different opinions on abortion by the main political parties in the US, the citizens, especially women remained divided on the way forward and the ideology to hold. This issue is so serious; therefore, requires politicians not to play politics with it. Since some abortions cause multiple deaths, that is, the mother and the unborn baby, the government ought to leave this issue to the women themselves to decide on the way forward (Cox). Moreover, issues of life and death have direct psychological r epercussions to the family of the deceased. For instance, there are working class women who in case of death, their families remain affected economically and socially. Death of a spouse due to abortion also shows unpreparedness in a family. In addition, the government does not always offer monetary support to children who are orphaned due to abortion, an act that they offer financial support through Medicaid. Therefore, the government ought to leave this issue to the women themselves to decide and fund the entire process. In terms of human rights, terminating the life of the unborn child is ethically wrong. This practice encourages unsafe and unplanned sex among people in the American society as they believe that they will get support from the government in order to undergo an abortion. The Republican opinion on abortion that no taxpayers’ money should be used to end the life of God’s creature should be upheld. It also encourages carelessness in sexual activities. This can lead to spread of Sexually Transmitted Diseases (STDs) like HIV/AIDS, syphilis, gonorrhoea among others. HIV/AIDS, for instance, is incurable, and from the World Health Organization’s statistics, the disease has caused numerous negative impacts across all sectors in the world. The removal of government support will improve the societal moral behaviours as they will view abortion as an evil and illegal activity that is prosecuted in a court of law. The US government, therefore, should shun away from meeting abortion costs among its citizens. A scrutiny of government expenditure shows that the US government uses over $542.4 million to fund abortion related activities. This cash can be directed to other programs like environmental conservation, enhancing food security in the third world countries, and sponsoring needy children in the society. For sure, this is a misplaced initiative by the government (Burneson). The government should leave abortion to be a personal choice a mong women as their involvement cost taxpayers millions of dollars. Whatever a woman does with her body should be of minimal concern to the government. The government should offer guidance and risks involved in abortion. The choice to abort or not should be left to a woman and her husband thereby avoiding public debates which will make it look controversial. If the government can leave this issue to be discussed privately among couples, then, the numerous life terminations will reduce tremendously. For instance, in a society where to remain unmarried to a woman is a leading cause for stigma, pregnancy will be the worst acts that women will want to happen to them. In fact, it will instil discipline among women. On the other front, government’s strict legislation on abortion can make pregnant women to sought for abortion from backstreet health centres with untrained ‘doctors’. Another ordeal involves conducting ultrasound of the foetus where women view and listen t o a given description. This proves traumatic. The strict legislation will directly affect the life of the victims; therefore, the victim should be left with this option of undergoing an abortion or not (Abortion Should Not Be Up For Debate). People hold different beliefs in their lifetimes. In this perspective, ones beliefs should not interfere with others. It also implies that the government should not take sides on this as it may be forcing others to abide by other people’s beliefs. The times for dictatorial leadership are long gone, unless the US government wants to take its citizens back to the middle ages; it should be up to the women to decide on what to do with their lives. Government involvement on the topic of abortion whether they support it or not causes severe effects to the lives of its citizens. On one side, government support to abortion through funding can make many women to engage in unprotected sex as they know that they will receive government support in or der to carry out an abortion. In addition, this support will go against other citizens’ beliefs; for example, the Catholics who hold that such practices are evil as they sum up to murder of innocent souls. On the other hand, the government restrictions on abortion may cause dissatisfaction among women who their lives may be in danger during the pregnancy period. Further, unplanned pregnancies may be aborted under risky conditions as the government has not legalised those centres thereby enhancing secrecy. One should be allowed to make and implement his/her decision freely. The freedom of choice is a fundamental law that the government should not interfere with at all times. For instance, if a woman believes that abortion is an immoral act, she will not practice it, and the government should also not come in to convince her that, at times, it can be done. On the other hand, if another woman wants an abortion, it will remain her own choice and not somebody else. In this situati on, the government should keep off in attempting to assist or hinder her abortion process. Instead of engaging in criticisms, women should be given psychological, moral and emotional support in order to go through the process. US should copy how Belgium handles her women during abortion periods. For example, a woman sees a psychologist before going through the procedure. Notably, the role of the psychologist is not to convince the woman to rescind on her decision of aborting but to continue counselling on her own decision (Abortion Should Not Be Up For Debate). Since abortion may come with challenging and stressful situations, it remains the role of the psychologist to guide the women on how to handle these challenges as they come. In any case the counselling process may alter the woman’s idea; she is allowed to take time off and come back later for further counselling. This Belgium’s move upholds the freedom of choice among its citizens. The US government should not i nterfere with personal decisions that directly affect its citizens. An attempt to meddle in this issue has been viewed as a possible way of contravening an individual’s beliefs and practices. Abortion should not be of foremost concern or debatable in the US but be left for women and their husbands to discuss in private places. It has also been noted that funding abortion has made taxpayers spend millions of dollars annually. Abortion, therefore, should be left to a woman to decide whether to perform it or not. Works Cited Abortion Plays Small Role in Health Reform Opposition. Pew Research Center for the People and the Press. Pew Research Center, 19 Nov. 2009. Web. Abortion Should Not Be Up For Debate. Policymic.com. Policymic Inc., n.d. Web. Abortion | American Civil Liberties Union. American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU). ACLU, n.d. Web. Burneson, Steven. â€Å"Polar Politics: Abortion should not be an issue considered by government .† CollegiateTimes.com. Educational Media Company, 17 Dec. 2012. Web. Cox, William John. â€Å"Abortion: The Government’s Choice? Women’s Reproductive Rights in the New America.† Global Research. Global Research, 27 Oct. 2008. Web. History of Abortion. Feminist.com. Touchstone, n.d. Web. Libertarianism. Libertarianism. The Advocates for Self-Government, n.d. Web. Robinson, Ba . â€Å"U.S. LAWS RESTRICTING ABORTION.† All about religious tolerance: the ReligiousTolerance.org web site. Ontario Consultants on Religious Tolerance, 31 Jan. 2008. Web. Sherratt, Timothy. â€Å"Religion, Abortion and the Role of Government.† Capital Commentary | Center for Public Justice. Center for Public Justice, 19 Oct. 2012. Web. Torre, Sarah. â€Å"Planned Parenthood Sets Record for Abortions and Government Funding.† The Foundry: Conservative Policy News Blog from The Heritage Foundation |. N.p., 9 Jan. 2013. Web. This research paper on The role of US Government on Abortions was written and submitted by user Drew Cox to help you with your own studies. You are free to use it for research and reference purposes in order to write your own paper; however, you must cite it accordingly. You can donate your paper here.